India’s Kudankulam reactors face startup woes

One of the Russian built reactors is automatically going into shut down mode too often and a turbine threw a blade taking it out of service for at least two months.

Kudankulam IndiaProblems of all kinds with Russian supplied equipment at the Kudankulam power station (KNPP), home to twin 1000 MW VVER type light water reactors, have raised safety fears according to a university study.

According to a report cited by the Times of India on Oct 29, the problems are caused by “outdated equipment” and “faulty installation.”

The report states, replying on plant data, that Unit 1 of the two unit installation, has an effective shut down rate equal to 21 times in 7000 hours of operation.  That’s about ten months or a rate of less than one automatic shutdown once a month.

Sources of the problems include irregular operation of the turbines and burst pipes in the feedwater system.

The Hindu newspaper reported on Oct 20 that the main turbine for Unit 1 was taken offline on September 13 and that subsequent reports indicate that a blade in the turbine broke off embedding itself in the turbine housing.

The Economic Times newspaper reported October 28 that a replacement blade would be fabricated by an Indian firm. In the meantime, plant engineers will take a turbine blade from Unit 2 and use it on Unit 1. It will take about two months to restart Unit 1.

Plant profile

The KNPP is installed with AES-92 (or V-466 model), the latest version of the third generation VVER-1000, that offers greater safety and longer lifespan, about 60 years.

According to a profile of the KNPP, Atomstroyexport is the main vendor and is responsible for the technical design, construction supervision, technical support for reactor commissioning, as well as for training the operation and maintenance staff of the plant. It is also responsible for supplying the equipment and materials for the KNPP including the turbines.

Bharat Heavy Electricals is responsible for setting up the machines at the plant. NPCIL takes care of construction, erection and commissioning of the plant.

Work began on the twin reactors in 2002, but was quickly halted due to protests which lasted nearly two years.  Assuming Rosatom orders long lead time items well ahead of when they are needed, the turbines that were commissioned with the plant in 2013 may have been designed as much as a decade earlier.

The same time line may be relevant for other parts of the plants although not the main reactor components themselves. Reliability of the balance of equipment may be a factor of its age, based on date of manufacturing, which could mean continued issues with overall.

turbine_erection_for_kudankulam_nuclear_power_project

According to a timeline from NPCIL the turbines (above ) were installed at KNPP by India’s Larsen & Tubro, Ltd. in 2008. Given the two year time frame to manufacture and deliver them, it is likely some of the components were ready for start of assembly in 2006. These dates suggest design work would have been completed by 2004 or earlier.

The polar crane, which has also been responsible for operational issues at KNPP Unit 1 was commissioned in 2007, six years prior to the time power was finally supplied to the grid from the reactor.

For its part the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) which owns and operates the reactor, has repeatedly said the plant is safe.

Protests put down

India’s political establishment actually quelled a lot of the protests in 2011 and 2012 with two tactics. First, NPCIL offered the regional governor the power to allocate 50% of the power from the two reactors to local customers. In the power-starved region of Tamil Nadu in extreme southern India, this was real patronage. Second, India ferociously deported a number of so-called NGO leaders, including several Greenpeace organizers from Germany, who were helping locals organized the opposition.

Paradoxically, the same regional political leaders who got the franchise to allocate the power in the province are now in jail on unrelated corruption charges.

Update

The start of fission process in the second Russian supplied 1000 MW VVER unit at Kudankulam has been postponed to March 2015, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (NPCIL) said on November 1.

According to NPCIL, the first criticality – start of fission – is expected to be in March 2015. Earlier, NPCIL said the unit would start fission process this month. No reason was given for the delay. However, the likely reason is that a turbine blade from Unit 2 is being pulled to replaced one that was damaged in Unit 1. A replacement blade is being fabricated by an Indian firm for the blade removed from Unit 2

# # #

About djysrv

Dan Yurman ~ About this blog and disclaimers for NeutronBytes ~ ~ https://neutronbytes.com/2014/08/31/welcome-post/ ** Contact Me ~ neutronbytes@gmail.com ~ Text via Signal 216-218-3823 ~ I am NOT active on Facebook, Reddit or Instagram. Attempt no landings there. ** Header Image Credit: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110904.html ~ ** Emails sent by readers about blog posts are considered to be comments for publication unless otherwise noted. ** The content of this blog is protected by copyright laws of the U.S. "Fair use" provisions apply. The RSS feed is for personal use only unless otherwise explicitly granted.
This entry was posted in kudankulam, Nuclear, VVER. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to India’s Kudankulam reactors face startup woes

  1. Pingback: Carnival of Nuclear Energy Bloggers #234 | Neutron Bytes

  2. Pingback: Can Russia Afford Its Reactor Exports?

Comments are closed.